Should Futurists Make Predictions?
This article was originally posted on futurist.com
The role of predictions in foresight work is a hotly debated topic, there’s no doubt. Being a futurist has become synonymous with the process of ‘prediction’ so that people can feel more comfortable accepting new possibilities.
Non-foresight folk have always gravitated towards them i.e. Badminton says that x will happen by 2025 vs. Nikolas speculates that complex situations might result in these speculative scenarios based on this lengthy, detailed, and collaborative inquiry.
Reading and believing predictions is easier I think because we want a warm, fuzzy feeling of what’s to come. A certainty. It’s almost like the trope of ‘the only way to predict the future is to create it’ — often attributed to the computer scientist Dr. Alan Kay at Xerox Palo Alto Research Center (Xerox PARC) in 1971. I guess that was more about technological colonization than prediction — widget x will revolutionize your life, people buy widget x and use it, their friends then start using their own widget x and so on. Yes, that atomic element of our ‘future’ was predicted through creation.
Me must abandon prediction if we are to embed foresight as a useful discipline in what we do. Foresight has rigor, whereas prediction shortcuts the process, finds convenient near-at-hand solutions, and is not easily defended when interrogated on grounds of fitting all our needs, equity, and equality.Dr. Wendy Schultz said it well (during one of our many chats on social media),
“If you are discussing complex adaptive systems in continuous relationship to chaotic turbulence, it goes against current theoretical understanding to claim you are predicting.”
This is quite true, and I suffered at the hands of my own predictions while working in digital strategy at an ad agency, ahead of the futures work I started in 2012.
It was late-2011 and I was I was invited to speak at an event hosted by the Canadian Broadcasting Company (CBC). I took to the stage to talk about digital engagement and what comes next. The London Olympics was happening the next year and there was huge buzz about digital payments and the use of smartphones to facilitate that. Part of my short — 6 minute — talk was about that and how the Olympics would be the tipping point because Samsung had created a partnership with Visa and “From the moment visitors land at Heathrow they will be immersed in a contactless payment experience with everything from taxis, to retail outlets, to the Olympic Park itself,” said the Visa press release that outlined that they expected there to be more than 140,000 contactless terminals in the UK by the time the Olympic Games start on 27 July.
Sure, some people may have used this solution but it seemed to be technological solutions going against cash and cards (a deeply ingrained cultural mechanism for payment) ahead of a want to change how people paid for things, and their ‘relationship’ with and reliance on their devices.
But, while in hindsight I was wrong about the speed, complexity of societal acceptance (of users and vendors) and triggers for solutions like this being adopted, it piqued interest at that event and people queued up to chat to me about that and other predictions.
People love predictions due to their provocative nature. People have strong opinions about predictions, mostly because they’re likely to be wrong and people can easily find counterpoints. The discussion that springs from predictions is useful and I feel not to be completely discarded.
I was drawn towards Ilkka Tuomi’s ‘Foresight in an Unpredictable World’ paper, and its conclusion,
“If the future cannot be predicted before it happens, foresight requires an imaginative step that resembles the movement of a mountain climber towards the next hold. For purely ontological reasons, foresight cannot be based on reactive models. Models inspired by physics, control theory or economics are structurally unable to encompass ontological expansion and innovation. They should therefore be used with caution. Foresight efforts can probably best be organized using reflective learning and knowledge creation as their theoretical framework. If innovation is important, we probably should give relatively little weight for trend extrapolations, what-if analyses, and time-series data, and instead facilitate creativity and embrace innovation.”
So, ontologically we must embrace reflective learning and knowledge creation — that is what I work towards with clients. Sure, there are technologies and innovations to consider but there are bigger questions about their effects and what we will become as humans and society beyond their mechanistic existences.
I still write yearly predictions, and it is not a practice of foresight per se. I use ‘predictions’ as a trojan horse into conversations that evolve into those of the greater need for foresight. Sometimes we need to recognize that we need that to break into the oft-regimented minds of strategically focused executives. A way to bring people closer to the idea that inquiry can be valuable in business. And, once in engagements I say that we are not in the business of prediction thus shattering that idea up front and progressing into more serious work of foresight.
About Nikolas Badminton FRSA, Chief Futurist
Nikolas is the Chief Futurist for the FUTURIST THINK TANK at futurist.com, a Fellow of The Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (The RSA), and works with trillion-dollar companies, central banks, governments, startups and those willing to challenge our poverty of imagination, awaken curiosity and create incredible futures.
He has worked with hundreds of world-leading companies, including NASA, Google, Microsoft, United Nations, United Way, Bayer, Corteva, Bank of Canada, American Express, AT&T, Thales International, Rolls Royce, Heineken, Procter & Gamble, Government of Canada, UK Home Office, Government of Cayman Islands, IDEO, and many more.
Nikolas has been a mainstay in the media for the past decade talking about our futures. He’s appeared in the ‘Smart Drugs’ documentary, was an advisor to the ‘Age of AI’ series with Robert Downley Jr and appears in the upcoming series ‘The Secrets of Big Data’ on Discovery. He appears regularly on SIRIUSXM, and on CTV’s Future Friday. His essential research has also been featured by the BBC, VICE, The Atlantic, Fast Company, Techcrunch, Business Insider, Huffington Post, Forbes, Sputnik, Venturebeat, and Global News. He also produces and interviews incredible thinkers on the renowned Exponential Minds Podcast.
In March 2023 Nikolas’ new book on futures design, long term thinking, and strategic foresight will be released — ‘Facing Our Futures’. This essential book will provide executives and organizations with the foundations for futures design and the tools to imagine new futures, create bolder visions, anticipate unforeseen risks, and strengthen strategic planning. Nikolas’ thinking can also be seen in the opening chapter of ‘The Future Starts Now’. Both are published by Bloomsbury Business.
Reach out to discuss your event or project.
